Opportunity area · theme founders discuss · intermediate

Community opportunity: sex great

Discussion · Sex great sits in the gap between “interesting thread” and “someone owns the outcome on Tuesday.” First metric beats first feature. Original insight: if onboarding costs more than the pain, you built a tutorial, not a company.

Problem

PMs turning into founders describe the same loop: notice the mess late, patch it manually, promise a system later, repeat next month. Unexpected challenge: support load rises when it works—users shove messier edge cases into the pipe. Hidden cost: QA/evaluation if any step is model-assisted—one bad output can kill the account.

Target user

Practitioners who already tried generic tools and still fail here

Proposed solution

Own checklists, data shapes, and approval rules for this theme so switching costs are process depth, not chat novelty. Discussion filter: if the thread is mostly status and jokes, demand is weak—move on. Counter-intuitive advice: raise prices earlier than feels polite. Underpricing attracts tourists and hides weak value. Distribution bottleneck: marketplaces and app directories tax you twice—once in fees, once in attention. One caution: avoid “platform” language in year one. Platforms are earned after a wedge works. One recommendation: define one success metric, put it on a one-page offer, and reject scope that does not move it. Practical next step: schedule the next user call before the next coding session. Real-world pattern: Shopify went deep on merchant workflows instead of being every app—depth beats horizontal novelty. Straight take: discussion energy is a hint, not a mandate. Most threads should become “not now.”